← Back to work Case Study — 2024
UX Research UX Strategy Interface Design User Flows AI Integration

Airbnb True-to-Listing Program

Building trust through user-verified listings and AI-powered accuracy.
Role: UX Designer (solo project) Tools: Figma
Airbnb True-to-Listing Program — project banner
85% of users rate trust as "Very Important" or "Extremely Important" when booking
50% expressed only "Neutral" or "Slight Confidence" in the accuracy of listings
65% said they would participate in verifying listings if given the right incentive
01 The Problem

Misleading listings erode trust

Airbnb users often encounter discrepancies between property photos and actual conditions — leading to dissatisfaction, negative reviews, and a gradual erosion of the platform's core value proposition: trust.

Without a clear verification process, users struggle to confidently book properties that meet their expectations. The gap between a beautifully photographed listing and the reality of a stay has become one of the most commonly cited frustrations across Airbnb's review ecosystem.

This creates a compounding problem: hosts who are genuinely accurate in their listings lose bookings to over-edited photography, while guests lose confidence in the platform as a whole. The business case for solving this is clear — trust is Airbnb's most valuable product.

"I've been burned before. Now I always read the reviews obsessively before booking — but even that isn't always enough."
— Survey respondent
02 Research & Discovery

Understanding what users actually need

Surveys targeting Airbnb users formed the core of the research, alongside analysis of complaint data and demographic trends to shape design decisions.

Research goal: Identify Airbnb user pain points, particularly regarding trust and transparency in listings — and understand what would motivate users to participate in a community verification system.

Survey questions and responses from Airbnb user research
Survey questions and key response data
Q — How important is trust when booking? 85%+

rated trust as "Very Important" or "Extremely Important" — confirming trust as the dominant booking factor, above price and location.

Q — What motivates trust in a listing? Clear visuals, honest reviews, and transparent descriptions topped responses. Users want verification signals, not just marketing photography.
Q — Would you participate in verifying listings? 65%

responded "Yes" or "Maybe" — a significant majority indicating genuine appetite for participation if the friction is low enough.

Q — What rewards would motivate participation? Discounts on future bookings and loyalty points were most popular — both directly tied to future platform use, aligning well with Airbnb's retention goals.
Q — How confident are you in listing accuracy? 50%

expressed only "Neutral" or "Slight Confidence" in listing accuracy. Half the platform's users are booking with significant uncertainty — a major trust failure.

Key insight Users want to trust Airbnb, they're willing to help build that trust, and they're most motivated by rewards that bring them back. This aligned tightly with a community verification reward system.

Who uses Airbnb?

Understanding the demographic landscape informed both the design of the verification flow and the reward system that would motivate participation.

Age demographic breakdown of Airbnb users
Age demographics — 25–34 is the largest user group at 36%
Gender split of Airbnb users
Gender split — 54% women, 46% men

The 25–34 age group represents 36% of Airbnb users — the most vocal segment in reviews and the most likely early adopters of a new feature. Family bookings have grown 60% vs pre-pandemic levels, with this segment having a particularly high need for listing accuracy. A child-safe property must be exactly as described.

User motivations

Most common complaints (2023)

Complaint category distribution chart for Airbnb 2023
Complaint categories — volume and distribution (2023)
Breakdown of the most common Airbnb complaints
Most common complaint types identified from platform review data
03 Define & Solution

Designing a trust-building system

The True-to-Listing Program is a community-powered verification system where guests submit photos of their stay, and AI compares them against the host's original listing images to flag discrepancies.

The solution has four interconnected components: a guest photo submission flow triggered post check-in, an AI comparison engine, a host notification and resolution system, and a rewards programme that incentivises guest participation.

How AI ensures listing accuracy

Problem and proposed solution diagram
Problem → proposed solution — how the True-to-Listing Program addresses the trust gap
04 Persona

Grounding design in a real person

A primary persona was developed from the survey data to represent the core user and guide every design decision throughout the project.

User persona for the Airbnb True-to-Listing Program
Primary persona — developed from survey data and demographic research
05 User Flows

Mapping the journey for every stakeholder

Three flows were designed: the basic program overview, the guest verification journey, and the host resolution journey when a listing is flagged.

The goal was to minimise friction for the guest while ensuring the host had a clear, fair, and timely process for resolving any flagged discrepancies. Both flows had to maintain trust in the platform — with hosts as well as guests.

Basic Program Flow — Overview
01User checks into the property
02Receives a notification inviting them to verify the listing
03User agrees to participate and uploads photos
04AI compares user-submitted photos with host-provided images
05Discrepancies are flagged; host is notified if necessary
06User receives a thank-you message and a reward for their participation
Basic program flow diagram
Basic program flow — from check-in notification to reward
Guest User Flow — Detailed Journey
01Invitation to participate arrives via in-app notification post check-in
02Guest reviews and agrees to terms and conditions — designed to be scannable, not a wall of legal text
03Guided photo upload — bedroom, kitchen, bathroom, living areas with on-screen prompts
04Submission confirmation sent — guest receives immediate acknowledgement
05Reward redemption — discount credit or loyalty points applied to account
Guest user flow diagram showing the verification journey
Guest user flow — invitation to reward redemption
Host User Flow — When a Listing Is Flagged
01AI flags discrepancies between guest-submitted and host-provided photos
02Host receives a clear notification explaining what was flagged, with both image sets shown side-by-side
03Host reviews the comparison and chooses: update listing photos, dispute the flag, or acknowledge and resolve
04Updated listing is re-verified against the new photos to confirm compliance
05Host receives confirmation — listing status restored and "Verified" badge applied
Host user flow diagram showing the flagged listing resolution process
Host user flow — from flagged listing to verified status
06 Design

Low-fidelity to high-fidelity

The design process began with wireframes to validate core interactions before moving to high-fidelity screens that brought the program to life within Airbnb's existing design language.

The initial wireframes focused on the key decision points in the guest flow — particularly the onboarding step and the guided photo upload, identified as the highest-friction moments likely to cause drop-off. The low-fidelity files were lost due to a Google Drive issue; the high-fidelity designs and interactive prototype below represent the final output.

A

Terms & Conditions Screen

Ensures users understand their participation and agree to the process. Designed to be scannable — key points surfaced as bullets rather than dense legal text. The goal: informed consent without overwhelming friction.

B

Photo Upload Guide

Clear, room-by-room guidance on capturing and submitting accurate photos. Camera-first interaction pattern reduces cognitive load — capture first, tag second. On-screen prompts help users frame shots correctly.

C

AI Verification Results

Guest images shown alongside listing photos with flagged discrepancies highlighted. Clear visual language distinguishes "match," "minor difference," and "significant discrepancy" states — transparent and actionable.

D

Thank-You & Reward Screen

Acknowledges user contribution and delivers the reward clearly — gift card credit or loyalty points. Closes the loop positively, reinforces participation behaviour, and includes a social sharing option to extend program awareness.

07 Prototype

Interactive prototype

The full guest journey — from onboarding through photo submission and AI verification to reward redemption — built in Figma and interactive below.

The prototype demonstrates the design's usability, accessibility, and flow, allowing you to experience the journey as a guest would. Use the embed below or open it directly in Figma for the full experience.

Open prototype in Figma →
08 Reflections

What I'd do differently

Good UX design is never finished — it's validated, shipped, learned from, and improved. Here's what I identified as the areas I'd tackle next.

What I'd improve

  • Onboarding: Streamline the terms and conditions — it's the highest drop-off risk. Testing would focus on how much users actually read vs. skim before agreeing, and whether a progressive disclosure pattern reduces abandonment.
  • Photo upload: Enhance in-camera guidance to reduce confusion about what to capture. An AR overlay showing framing guides could significantly reduce incomplete submissions.
  • AI feedback: More specific, actionable feedback from the AI — not just "discrepancy flagged" but "the sofa in the listing photo appears to have been replaced." Transparency builds trust in the system itself.

What I'd do next

  • Usability testing: Moderated testing with 8–12 users to identify pain points in the upload flow and measure task completion against a benchmark.
  • Gamification: Progress tracking and contributor badges to build community identity — "Trusted Verifier" status as a social signal among frequent travellers.
  • Localisation: Language, cultural expectations around privacy, and photo norms vary significantly across Airbnb's markets. A global rollout needs local nuance.
  • Host research: Deeper qualitative research with hosts is needed. The host flow was designed to feel fair, but real host feedback would reveal whether the notification and resolution process respects their time and relationship with the platform.

Afterthoughts on UX

This project highlighted the importance of building trust through transparency and user participation. One of the key takeaways was understanding how UX can be a powerful tool for enhancing user confidence in a platform — not just through visual polish, but through system design that gives users genuine agency.

Balancing simplicity, functionality, and trustworthiness was the central design challenge throughout. The verification flow had to feel effortless for the guest while producing structured, useful data for the AI comparison engine — a tension that pushed careful thinking about what to collect at each step and what to defer or infer.

The process reaffirmed that the most valuable insights often come from watching someone use your prototype for the first time — not from assumptions made in a design sprint.